Boutique Litigation Law Firm - Retain Lawyers - Research based Law Firm - Complete legal services

Rules applicable on the date of consideration of application for compassionate appointment are only applicable; SC.

Supreme Court of India

JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, JUSTICE A. S. BOPANNA & JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

The SC {N.C. Santhosh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.} holds that appointment to any public post in the service of the State has to be made on the basis of principles in accord with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule. It was held that the Dependent of a deceased government employee are made eligible by virtue of the policy on compassionate appointment and they must fulfill the norms laid down by the State’s policy. 

It was further held that the law governing compassionate appointment is that the norms, prevailing on the date of consideration of the application, should be the basis for consideration of claim for compassionate appointment. A dependent of a government employee, in the absence of any vested right accruing on the death of the government employee, can only demand consideration of his/her application. He is however disentitled to seek consideration in accordance with the norms as applicable, on the day of death of the government employee. 

In the present case, the appellants here were the beneficiary of compassionate appointments. But on the discovery that their appointments were made dehors the provisions of the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996 as amended w.e.f. 1.04.1999, those appointments came to be cancelled. The amendment to the proviso to Rule 5 stipulated that in case of a minor dependant of the deceased government employee, he/she must apply within one year from the date of death of the government servant and he must have attained the age of eighteen years on the day of making the application. Before amendment, the minor dependant was entitled to apply till one year of attaining majority. The appeals of the appellants were dismissed by the SC.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published