Immovable Property Disputes

Property Lawyer: Succession to properties of erstwhile rulers of India shall be governed by personal law; not by rule of primogeniture; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer August 05, 2019 - 04:00

Property Lawyer: Succession to properties of erstwhile rulers of India shall be governed by personal law; not by rule of primogeniture; SC.

Supreme Court of India CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Deepak Gupta, & Justice Aniruddha Bose The SC {Talat Fatima Hasan vs. Nawab Syed Murtaza Khan}...

Read more

Property Lawyer: After disposal of the appeal, the trial court decree merges into the appellate court decree; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 31, 2019 - 03:30

Property Lawyer: After disposal of the appeal, the trial court decree merges into the appellate court decree; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice Indira Banerjee The SC {Surinder Pal Soni versus Sohan Lal} held that after passing of t...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Third party dispossessed in execution of decree - for getting possession back have to prove tittle - mere possession is not sufficient; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 30, 2019 - 12:30

Property Lawyer: Third party dispossessed in execution of decree - for getting possession back have to prove tittle - mere possession is not sufficient; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha The SC was considering the question that whether the third party who was dispo...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Mere disobedience of order is not punishable under order 39 Rule 2A CPC; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 27, 2019 - 08:04

Property Lawyer: Mere disobedience of order is not punishable under order 39 Rule 2A CPC; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice R Banumathi and Justice A S Bopanna Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, the appellant before the SC, was sentenced to impris...

Read more

Property Lawyer: No requirement for taking physical possession for Land Acquisition; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 26, 2019 - 04:34

Property Lawyer: No requirement for taking physical possession for Land Acquisition; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Arun Mishra and Justice M R Shah The SC {State of Haryana and others versus Sunder Lal} holds that in case of land a...

Read more

Property Lawyer: The High Court in second appeal cannot interfere with finding of fact, how gross or inexcusable the error may be; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 25, 2019 - 09:00

Property Lawyer: The High Court in second appeal cannot interfere with finding of fact, how gross or inexcusable the error may be; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Hemant Gupta & Justice L Nageswara Rao The SC {Randhir Kaur versus Prithvi Pal Singh and others} holds that the ...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Cross objection in appeal requires to be decided on merits, irrespective of dismissal of main appeal; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 16, 2019 - 10:48

Property Lawyer: Cross objection in appeal requires to be decided on merits, irrespective of dismissal of main appeal; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Indu Malhotra The SC (Sh. Badru versus NTPC Limited) holds that even if the appeal i...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Decree not mandatory for filing execution petition; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 15, 2019 - 14:09

Property Lawyer: Decree not mandatory for filing execution petition; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari The SC {Sir Sobha Singh and Sons Private Limited versus Shashi Moh...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Supreme Court sets aside ex-parte decree, and holds that ordinarily case should be decided on merits.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 09, 2019 - 05:22

Property Lawyer: Supreme Court sets aside ex-parte decree, and holds that ordinarily case should be decided on merits.

Supreme Court of India Justice K.M. Joseph and Justice Ashok Bhushan The SC holds that ordinarily, a litigation is based on adjudication done on th...

Read more

Property Lawyer: Succession opened prior to 1956 makes the property coparcenary; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 08, 2019 - 14:29

Property Lawyer: Succession opened prior to 1956 makes the property coparcenary; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice U U Lalit The Supreme Court {Arshnoor Singh vs Harpal Kaur and others} holds that if succe...

Read more

Property lawyer: In case of dismissal of suit for partition, the defendants also have right to appeal; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 06, 2019 - 14:17

Property lawyer: In case of dismissal of suit for partition, the defendants also have right to appeal; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice M R Shah and Justice L Nageswara Rao The Supreme Court reiterated that in the suit for partition, every party to the...

Read more

Property Lawyer: In composite Suit for declaration and possession - limitation is of 12 years; SC.

By team of Advocate Retainer July 04, 2019 - 11:00

Property Lawyer: In composite Suit for declaration and possession - limitation is of 12 years; SC.

Supreme Court of India Justice Deepak Gupta, Justice N V Ramana and Justice Indira Banerjee The Supreme Court {Sopanrao & Anr. Vs. Syed Mehmood...

Read more